next up previous contents
Next: Results for two Up: Results for XMM Previous: Results for XMM

Practical evaluation of likelihood ratio and reliability

 

When matching two source lists (on the basis of positional coincidence, as described in section gif), one runs through each XMM source and compares it with every WFC object in the field, computing the distance to it along great circles. RA and Dec offsets and magnitude are stored for all WFC candidates out to 50 arcsecs for each XMM source, and likelihood ratios are computed as described in the previous section. We then evaluate reliabilities according to equation gif.

This was done using WFC i--band source lists as this is usually the deepest band and data is consistently available for all fields with XMM data.

A database of cumulative magnitude counts was created for the WFC data: bins are 0.25 magnitude wide and contain the number of objects per square arcsec with magnitude less than or equal to the upper limit of the bin. The area cover by one WFC pointing (4 CCD's) is taken to be around 0.2 square degrees. This was then used to estimate the background density as a function of magnitude for each candidate,


Richard McMahon
Tue Feb 27 19:44:29 GMT 2001