Dynamical Time: TT, TDB

Dynamical time is the independent variable in the theories which describe the motions of bodies in the solar system. When you use published formulae which model the position of the Earth in its orbit, for example, or look up the Moon's position in a precomputed ephemeris, the date and time you use must be in terms of one of the dynamical timescales. It is a common but understandable mistake to use UT directly, in which case the results will be about 1 minute out (in the present era).

It is not hard to see why such timescales are necessary. UTC would clearly be unsuitable as the argument of an ephemeris because of leap seconds. A solar-system ephemeris based on UT1 or sidereal time would somehow have to include the unpredictable variations of the Earth's rotation. TAI would work, but eventually the ephemeris and the ensemble of atomic clocks would drift apart. In effect, the ephemeris is a clock, with the bodies of the solar system the hands.

Only two of the dynamical timescales are of any great importance to observational astronomers, TT and TDB. (The obsolete timescale ET, ephemeris time, was more or less the same as TT.)

Terrestrial Time TT is the theoretical timescale of apparent geocentric ephemerides of solar system bodies. It applies to clocks at sea-level, and for practical purposes it is tied to Atomic Time TAI through the formula TT = TAI + $32^{\rm s}\hspace{-0.3em}.184$.In practice, therefore, the units of TT are ordinary SI seconds, and the offset of $32^{\rm s}\hspace{-0.3em}.184$ with respect to TAI is fixed. The SLALIB routine sla_DTT returns TT-UTC for a given UTC (n.b. sla_DTT calls sla_DAT, and the latter must be an up-to-date version if recent leap seconds are to be taken into account).

Barycentric Dynamical Time TDB differs from TT by an amount which cycles back and forth by between 1 and 2 milliseconds due to relativistic effects. The variation is negligible for most purposes, but unless taken into account would swamp long-term analysis of pulse arrival times from the millisecond pulsars. It is a consequence of the TT clock being on the Earth rather than in empty space: the ellipticity of the Earth's orbit means that the TT clock's speed and gravitational potential vary slightly during the course of the year, and as a consequence its rate as seen from an outside observer varies due to transverse Doppler effect and gravitational redshift. By definition, TDB and TT differ only by periodic terms, and the main effect is a sinusoidal variation of amplitude $0^{\rm s}\hspace{-0.3em}.0017$; the largest lunar and planetary terms are nearly two orders of magnitude smaller. The SLALIB routine sla_RCC provides a model of TDB-TT accurate to a few nanoseconds. There are other dynamical timescales (TCG and TCB, not supported by SLALIB routines at present), which include allowance also for the secular terms. These timescales gain on TT and TDB by about $0^{\rm s}\hspace{-0.3em}.0013$/day.

For most purposes, the distinction between TT and TDB is of no practical importance. For example when calling sla_PRENUT to generate a precession-nutation matrix, or when calling sla_EVP to predict the Earth's position and velocity, the time argument is strictly TDB, but TT is near enough and will require less computation.

Investigations of topocentric solar-system phenomena such as occultations and eclipses require solar time as well as dynamical time. TT/TDB/ET is all that is required in order to compute the geocentric circumstances, but if horizon coordinates or geocentric parallax are to be tackled UT is also needed. A rough estimate of $\Delta {\rm T} = {\rm ET} - {\rm UT}$ is available via the routine sla_DT. For a given epoch (e.g. 1650) this returns an approximation to $\Delta {\rm T}$ in seconds.